‘Glee’ stars GQ cover too inappropriate?

Posted by:

When I first saw these pictures this morning online, I thought they were a bit too steamy! Maybe I’m just showing my age, here, but aren’t these pictures a bit naughty? I know they’re not teenagers in real life, but they play teenagers on TV. I’m not sure that spreading your legs in your underwear is in good taste.

Glee stars Cory Monteith, Lea Michele and Dianna Agron are on the cover of the latest GQ Magazine.

Tags: , , , , ,

Posted by:
Tuesday, October 19th, 2010 at 7:07am
Filed under Cory Monteith, Dianna Agron, Glee, Lea Michele, Magazine Covers | 12 Comments






Comments

Add Your Comment

  • First-time commenter? A confirmation email will be sent to you after you post your comment.

  • Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Comments

October 19th, 2010 at 8:05 am

My thoughts exactly. They just play teenagers but they aren’t really. I don’t see anything wrong with it.

October 19th, 2010 at 8:21 am

I’m with Lisa. They’re all adults. Besides, GQ is an adults only magazine. And for all of the husbands out there who are forced to watch Glee with their wives – these images ought to make it a whole lot more bearable.

October 19th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

Hahaha veryyy true!

October 19th, 2010 at 6:03 pm

Just two more actresses who would rather be known for their assets – ahem – than their acting skills. Nothing novel and certainly nothing impressive.

October 19th, 2010 at 9:26 pm

It is a magazine for men. it go folks.

The show is PG14 too little kids shouldn’t be watching.

October 20th, 2010 at 12:36 am

More importantly, why did Cory keep his clothes?

October 20th, 2010 at 6:04 am

They’re not inapropriate, they’re hot! it’s good that they show their sexy side… we all have one.

October 20th, 2010 at 10:59 am

Just a bunch of horny trolls, get a life!

October 29th, 2010 at 8:50 am

I think we have been seeing too many actors who are well past their teen years but being cast 18 to play younger (as the practice is known), because someone told them they look like a kid, that we have forgotten what real teenagers look like. I just can’t see how anyone would have a problem with this unless they are like Tommy (blind, deaf and dumb). I think the media has so warped our sense of sight that we can’t tell when someone onscreen is just acting at playing younger instead of really being the age they portray in TV and movies.

November 18th, 2010 at 2:31 am

looks like amature porn if kids watch this show they are a bad example

Show">
Show">Show
November 1st, 2011 at 4:37 pm

whoah this weblog is excellent i really like studying your posts. Keep up the great work! You recognize, lots of individuals are looking around for this information, you could aid them greatly.

3d blu ray player reviews">3d blu ray player reviews
February 29th, 2012 at 1:44 am

Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been running a blog for? you made blogging look easy. The overall glance of your site is fantastic, let alone the content!
















Follow ICYDK