Kat Von D gets her tattoos covered up for Sephora!

Comments 114
Posted by:

1gtchf.jpg

Kat Von D did a photoshoot for Sephora with full body make-up cover up in order to hide her tattoos. She is doing an ad campaign for her new fragrance. She recently did a similar photoshoot for her new make-up line, to hide tattoo’s.

This is what she said today:

“Aside from that, I am proud of the tattoos Corey, Dan and I did for the show – and I finally get to reveal to the gang photos from my Sephora shoot for the new fragrances I’ve been working so hard on!!!”

25s8zrn.jpg

What do you think, better before – or after?

Posted by:
Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 3:15pm
Filed under Kat Von D | 114 Comments






Comments

Add Your Comment

  • First-time commenter? A confirmation email will be sent to you after you post your comment.

  • Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Comments

susangalique">susangalique
August 11th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

I think she looks better without the tats, its really distracting and makes her look hard.

August 11th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

i just think she is so pretty without the tats and the overdone makeup…

August 11th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

i agree with susan

August 11th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

I agree, the tatoos are very distracting. The first picture i’m looking at her face, the second, her tattoos. I hardly noticed the products that shes holding

August 11th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

I always thought Kat was gorgeous. Seeing her without the tattoos, just shows how much of a natural beauty she is. wow.

Still think she is sexy with the tats too

August 11th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

glad that she is very unique and no hollywood chick or bimbo.i dont like tats but i like the fact that she is unique on the outside

August 11th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

She is GORGEOUS in the non-tattoo pic!

August 11th, 2009 at 9:54 pm

A no-brainer. She is a beautiful woman – without the tatts. The photo proves it, and will probably make her regret them. A beautiful body is never enhanced by grafitti, no matter how artful it is.

August 12th, 2009 at 3:41 am

She’s beyond fabulous no matter what! Kat’s like the coolest chick ever!

August 12th, 2009 at 4:44 am

I like her MUCH better with the tattoos. And so does my hunny….:)

August 12th, 2009 at 5:52 am

That first pick looks like Shakira

August 12th, 2009 at 6:08 am

Kat is beautiful……either way

August 12th, 2009 at 6:16 am

OMG she is gorgeous—without the tats.

August 12th, 2009 at 6:29 am

Definitely more attractive (to me) without the tats. I can’t wait to see what they look like when she’s 60…70…80.

August 12th, 2009 at 6:31 am

Why cover the tattoos? That’s not who she is at all. Sure she looks good either way, but she is like a walking piece of art. To cover them is to take away who she is.

Gabriel">Gabriel
August 12th, 2009 at 6:36 am

Kat without the tattoos = beautiful
Kat with the tattoos = trashy

August 12th, 2009 at 6:54 am

the reason for the different looks is for her 2 new perfumes. one is “sweet” and one is “naughty”. she is also promoting her make-up line in the shoot by using her line of tattoo cover-up. and she is beautiful either way.

August 12th, 2009 at 6:57 am

I agree with Beth. Shes a beautiful women. Her advertising campaign however, is broader based.
Surely the people who know WHO she is and want to buy her products, know shes tattooed and might think shes changing who she is to sell merch.Could work backwards for her!!

August 12th, 2009 at 7:16 am

I think she is beautiful with or without the tats. She certainly looks classier without them. The thing that bothers me the most is why she needs to be dressed in a bra and panties without tats (allegedly to make her more beautiful) showing so much skin and what not to sell perfume to women…WUw/T? A better shot in my opinion would be a close up with her face makeup in the first shot, not covering her stars which she is known for, and her hair in the first one. Why deny who she is and why do we have to sexualize her to sell perfume?

August 12th, 2009 at 7:29 am

They are not trying to make her look like a different person or hide who she is. The perfume is called sinner and saint, the saint perfume is her without and the tattooed Kat is the sinner perfume…so one as her as a sinner and one as her as a saint. Either way she looks awesome.

August 12th, 2009 at 7:34 am

She\’s smoking in both photos but ask your self one simple question if you didn\’t know her and most don\’t, which shot looks lie the girl you\’d like to smell like?… be honest we all know the answer and that\’s why they did simple marketing and capitalism and nothing more. So much for individualism.

August 12th, 2009 at 7:38 am

Here perfume is called Saint/Sinner which explains the photos. One is supposed to be Saint (sans tattoos) and the other is Sinner. It was all part of a plan. She wasn\’t covering them to try and sell her fragrance – it was a part of the whole plan.

August 12th, 2009 at 8:30 am

I think she looks lovely without the tats, but I think she looks even better with them.
The tats are part of her, her personality, the way people identify with them, all of that.
I really love her idea of thee shoot though, works perfect for her perfume.

August 12th, 2009 at 8:53 am

Allegedly if you have a bunch of tattoos and leather under wear you are branded a sinner and if you have lacy panties you are a saint? WTFisUw/T? So riddle me this…what if you are covered in Jesus/Budda/Cross/Cows/generally religious tattoos? Are you a sinner or a saint…

August 12th, 2009 at 9:07 am

I think she looks great in both pictures. Her tattoos reflect on who she is and where she has been in her life. I have a few tattoos and I always laugh when people say “what are you going to do when you’re an old lady?” Well, I’ll be an old lady with tattoos…

August 12th, 2009 at 9:21 am

I love her with her tats and all. She looks prettier with them and makes her who she is. Beautiful!

August 12th, 2009 at 9:34 am

she defintiely looks better without the tats but that may also be because they did a little photoshop on her. she has more curves and is more defined in the pic without the tats. either way what a beautiful girl. only problem is a saint would not be wearing lingerie for perfume. apparently sex sells but the message of the ad is getting crossed with sex and saint. you need to pick one or the other. a saint would keep it behind closed doors a sinner would be the one to expose herself and let it all out for every eye to see.

Alan">
Alan">Alan
August 12th, 2009 at 10:24 am

she so hot with them why cover them up but
she’s just showing us who she is with or with out
for me i LOVE her with but that’s me

August 12th, 2009 at 10:34 am

The tat photo by far! IT expresses her personality. The first on is just an ad to get you to buy something. The second is all Kat. and it will sell her fragarence.

August 12th, 2009 at 10:36 am

I like the 2nd pic. It show who she is and its the story of her life and the 1st pic she looks fake. She is who she is and she should not change who she is to sell things.

August 12th, 2009 at 11:01 am

That a person who does tats for a living is selling makeup to cover them up? The tats are permanent, so why would you want to cover them up at all?

August 12th, 2009 at 11:13 am

WOW !!!! I thought she was so hot with the tats. She could be a super model without. Nikki is one super lucky dude.

August 12th, 2009 at 11:19 am

I think the pic with out the tats makes her look like a corpse! Too much thick makeup.. why take away from your true self.. her tattoo’s express who she is and what she believes in and everyone has a right do express that! For those who have tattoo’s, you know why you got them, each one means something very personal to you.. and who cares what you look like when your 80yrs old with tats.. why worry about that now!

August 12th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

Well, as always, Americans need to see the photoshop to REALIZe How pretty she is.. young country..
Ummm and I read someone “these pics will make her regret” NEVER SHE is a TATTOOER! She CAN’T regret dude..

August 12th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

Tattoos are trashy, no matter if it’s one or twenty.

She should wear her tattoo-hiding makeup all over, every single day or start laser removal. She looks so much better without them. Tattoos suck.

August 12th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

she’s flawless looking… with or without the tats.

August 13th, 2009 at 1:29 am

I am SO sad that she sold herself out like that!!! She was amazing when I met her in person, I thought she was really genuine. Now I think, “What a flake!” Obviously tattooing is who she is what she is all about. Poor Kat, is it really worth it for some silly bottle of perfume?? Perfume fades and so does beauty and even tattoos. But your rep and these images, stay around long after your gone. And to all the people who think she looks “better without the artwork or that tattoos are “trashy” BUZZ OFF!

August 13th, 2009 at 2:48 am

I wouldn’t have as much of a problem with the picture with no tattoos if it wasn’t photoshopped to make her look super thin and toned. Now I’m not saying she’s fat in the least bit but her hips aren’t that narrow and her tummy isn’t that toned.

August 13th, 2009 at 5:28 am

This perfume ad should be used as a PSA for little children to show them why they shouldn’t get tattoos. When I see people like her tattooed up one side and down the other it’s really hard to contain the laughter.
As a younger man, I was neighbors with an elderly european woman. Once she showed me her tattoo, she got hers in a Nazi Death Camp. Hey good luck to all you inked up people at your next job interview.

August 13th, 2009 at 8:09 am

KAT AND NIKKI DONT DATE ANYMORE AND I THINK SHE LOOKS WAY BETTER WITHOUT TATTOOS SHE CAN ACTUALLY LOOK NORMAL! AND I THINK SHE LOOKS SO TRASHY WITH HER TATTOOS BUT WHATEVER..I STILL BELIEVE SHE HAS HAD A SEX CHANGE SHE HAS TOO MUCH OF A MANLY JAW AND NECK..

August 13th, 2009 at 11:03 am

Tommy_G;

Just so you know, I am very gainfully employed as an accountant and have many tattoos. I have at least 6 other coworkers who also have multiple tattos. Just because you are close-minded doesn’t mean everyone else is. It is possible to consider a job applicant’s experience and efficacy, instead of seeing tattoos and deciding that’s all you need to know about the person. I believe there is an old saying that goes “Don’t judge a book by it’s Cover.” Ever heard of it?

August 13th, 2009 at 11:40 am

What the hey? Kat Von D without tats is like politics without liars. She is not even recognizable without them. She looks like an everyday model without them. Her tattoos make her an individual. She should celebrate her art. I would think she would at least leave the face star tattoo – it\’s part of her persona. It makes her seem a little sell out to not have them in her add.

August 13th, 2009 at 11:54 am

Kat Von D is a natural beauty and wears her soul on her skin. Kat wihtout the tattoos isn’t Kat.
love,peace n’ cheers

August 13th, 2009 at 11:55 am

Wow, talk about judgemental. I find Kat beautiful not only because she is, tats or not although I will say I too believe they are part of who she is so I prefer them. I myself being a “heavily tattooed woman” cannot believe the shallowness of some of the comments made. Wait, yes I can because I “deal” with people like you everyday. What you don’t realize is that this is a lifestyle choice. I don’t expect you to do the same or find it any prettier than I find over processed hair and fake boobs, disgusting. And as far as jobs go, I have never had a problem finding a decent job. Believe it or not education and competence do go a long way. I’m in finance by the way, one field that many are “shocked” to see a heavily tattooed female in. And I thank my lucky stars everyday that I have a boss as open minded has he is to allow me to be myself and let my work speak for itself. I don’t regret a single tattoo I have and cherish them for what they mean to me. I don’t worry about what they may look like as I get older because for me they will always look like I lived my life for ME. And I kinda like the fact that they are an a–hole magnet, I can weed out the a–holes that are quick to judge rather than to take the time to get to know me. Kat- you’re beautiful the way you are and we need more intelligent, vibrant, successful HEAVILY tattooed Ladies out there. Maybe than we can break some of these sterotypes that you must be a “certain” way to be beautiful. And as for “class” I ‘d say, I see zero class in the comments left. You probably call yourself spiritual while so quick to pass judgement. And “trashy” you want trashy try looking in the latest issue of Cosmo or going to a local dance club where all the “cheerleader effect” pop icon dreaming girls hang out. Trashy comes in many forms and I see alot more of it in the attitudes on this page than I do looking at an add for Kat Von D. Damn shame.

August 13th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

ugh, the non-tatt pic is so obviously airbrushed to make her look ultra-skinny. Compare her arms in the two photos. The reason they probably had her cover up her tatts was so that they could airbrush her skinny. You can’t airbrush someone skinny when they have tattoos all over, the slimming becomes too obvious.

August 13th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Kat looks awsome with her tattoos..
and without,
I juste love her look!!

August 13th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

Hey I just wanted to say, with or without tattoo’s a person is still a person. I think she is a BEAUTIFUL woman no matter what. The tattoo’s just explain who she is. When I’m proud of things i/e: I’m a union Ironworker, and a pro fisherman, I tattoo things that remind me of what I’ve done and gone through to show people. A picture tell’s a better story than words. So “us” people tatted up are still just as good as the people without tats. Don’t judge, not your body only one person will judge us all!
Respectfully
Tyler

August 13th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

Makeup my a$$ – can you say Photoshop? She looks great without the tats but, the tats are who she is. She is a celebrity due to her art and the art on her body. They should ditch the non-tat photos and go with the (somewhat) real images (these have been Photoshopped, too.)

August 13th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

this is so stupid.
youre all weird as hell..i dont read up on this girls life, i dont care. The only reason i was even on here reading your ridiculous responses was because i was looking up her tattoo cover up which doenst make her a “sell out”? people get tattoos for reasons like all of you said..but there are places where they shouldnt be shown..as in work. shes covering them all up as part of her add and to market her tattoo concealer product because theres places where..they shouldnt show.

youre all stupid.
seriously..knowing so much about someone..you dont know..is unbelievably pathetic.

August 13th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

and who gives a shit if shes airbrushed.. although when i scrolled over the pictures i didnt notice any difference besides her concealed tattoos.
youre all sick for needing to call out any imperfections on a picture you must have studied for ten minutes.
psychos..

August 13th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

i highly doubt she’s even wearing cover-up make up in the first photo. its all photoshop-ed. and it looks terrible. yes she’s beautiful, no doubt. personally i’d go with tattoos. thats who she is. i dont think she’s a sell out for taking them off. but her stuff will sell with or without tattoos. they are so widely less frowned upon these days.

August 13th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

She’s beautiful in both pictures. The tattoo’s are part of her, and she’s gorgeous with or without them. I prefer her with tattoo’s, as its what makes her Kat Von D.

August 13th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

With out her tattoos, Kat Von D just isn’t Kat Von D. I believe she looks much much better with her tattoos. It gives her the uniqueness she’s always had. Covering them up is lying I think. She is a beautiful woman and deserves to show her tattoos. They are beautiful and art. With out them she looks like any other woman in Hollywood. Her fragrence is edgy and unique, why shouldn’t her advertisment for it be?

August 13th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

I wonder how much of that is photoshopped…

August 14th, 2009 at 12:50 am

without the tats she looks like a super model, but if she didn’t have them she just wouldn’t be the chick that caught our attention in the first place. But I do agree about the make up, she could tone it down.

August 14th, 2009 at 5:49 am

She is very pretty but I think that without the tattoos she is just another pretty girl who doesn\’t seem any different than the other million pretty girls out there. Se just seems to have lost her personality in the first picture. I thinks she needs them to make her more than just another pretty face!

August 14th, 2009 at 7:58 am

Let’s think about this tattoo’s are indeed distracting but always portray a hard type of image. And I think she brings a softness to her art…so hot!

August 14th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

Actually, I saw the episode about it on LA Ink, and her without the tats really IS all makeup! Sure, they used Photoshop too, to tone her body and what not, but they really did take the time to put makeup all over her body.

That being said, I think she looks better without the tattoos. She looks too hard with her entire body covered like that.

August 14th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

I think she looks plain without her tats, just another girl in Hollywood. Her tats are who she is and that makes her beautiful. People who think she looks trashy or hard with tats are too chicken shit to get ones themself. She has so much confidence and doesn’t care with people think about her and that makes her sexy.

August 14th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

I think Kat without tattoos and with a nude makeup is very pretty than a strong makeup (eyes an lips) plus tattoos, it’s too much.

I’m graphic designer, I know…photoshop it’s amazing!

August 15th, 2009 at 2:45 am

if you go to this link you can see the photo of Kat before the airbrushes got to work! tattoosdayuk.wordpress.com

August 15th, 2009 at 7:40 am

http://tattoosdayuk.wordpress.com/ before the photos were airbrushed!

trevor stewart">trevor stewart
August 15th, 2009 at 9:31 am

trevor stewart would like to meet a nice girl and may be get married and have kids katvond

mi'chell">mi'chell
August 15th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

honestly, i think she looks gorgeous in both the photos. but i defiantly like the tattoed one better. to everyone who says that she should’ve never got them fuck all ya’ll. she’s never going to regret her tattoos because all of them have MEANING TO HER.

August 16th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

Beautiful no matter what she does. Could be in a garbage bag and would still be gorgeous.

August 17th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

she looks boring and plain in the first picture.

August 17th, 2009 at 9:58 pm

She looks beautiful “WITH” her tattoo’s. I do not like the phonny baloney air brushed picture…..!

August 18th, 2009 at 11:59 am

I think she looks better WITH the tattoos. Gorgeous. Without them, she looks just like any other vacant Hollywood bimbo. The tatts give her personality and make her stand out from the crowd.

August 18th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

I dont care what she is labled as, she looks better with out all the tats- and thats coming from some one with sleeves.

August 18th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

Photoshop award winner–both photos. Yuck.

And, UGH!

FOR ALL THE IDIOTS here…

Tattoos: plural
Tattoo’s: possessive
Tat = shortened version
Tats = shortened version, plural

It’s not that difficult to educate yourselves, people!

August 18th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

she looks gorgeous either way and i met her in san francisco last year.. wow what a nice woman. she was so sweet and down to earth!

August 22nd, 2009 at 3:16 am

She is who she is! F*%K all you guys who say she is prettier without them. Its what she loves and has dedicated her life to. Props to her! She is BEAUTIFUL.

September 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 pm

I think that she is beautiful. I do not have one tat but I beleive that some just look great wearing them and others do not. I think that she is one that wears them well. She is hot with or without. I just think that she is Kat Von D with them and that is who I would love her to be is herself.

September 6th, 2009 at 9:10 am

Some of you have way too much time on your hands. …Kat is a very Beautiful Lady, don’t judge her… live and let live. Our choices in life are for a reason and we all have the right to decide for ourselves what we want in life. Right or wrong, it’s who we are. Enjoy life and accept people for who they are, and help those less fortunate or struggling with addiction. …You’ll live longer and be happier for it! :o)

September 11th, 2009 at 7:30 am

SHE IS BEAUTIFUL! Her tattoos suit her personality inside and out but wow!!!! We all love her!

Nate">
Nate">Nate
September 16th, 2009 at 7:21 am

She’s definitely hot both ways. It is strange to see her without them. I think its a striking campaign to have both shots though… very smart.

-Nate
Wow Tattoos – Ambigram Tattoo Designs

September 18th, 2009 at 9:38 pm

I personally think she’s gorgeous in both pictures

September 19th, 2009 at 6:22 am

I always wondered what she’d look like without tattoos, because they are a little distracting. However it’s been confirmed that she’s as beautiful as I thought she’d be without them. I think she’s beautiful regardless tho. she’s not “Kat Von D” without them. I agree that it’s a pretty smart looking campaign.

Claudia">Claudia
October 5th, 2009 at 10:54 am

She looks better with out the tattoos♥

October 9th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

Kat is beautiful without the tattoos, but the tattoos are what make her who she is…without them she is a beautiful underwear model…

November 6th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

She is so pretty without them…but anyone can beautiful but only Kat Von D can rock the tats like she does and i love her for it

Jazzmin">Jazzmin
January 3rd, 2010 at 10:53 am

well I agree with everyone who decided individualism is more important i think she is crazy smoken with the tattoos and like every other too good to be true model ! while still beautiful I think the true sexy hard and still stunning with the tattys !!!

naughty princess

(thats tattooed across my chest)

January 22nd, 2010 at 10:29 am

this ad campaign was created to advertise the debut of Kat’s fragrance collection (a polished look with the white bottled SAINT perfume and a bad b**** look with the SINNER/SAINT perfumes in hand) AND the addition of a tattoo concealer to her makeup line @ Sephora.
The fact that’s she’s wearing a bra and panties in both is most likely bcuz as u can clearly see, she has tattoos on her arms, stomach, and upper legs. You wouldn’t be able to see them if she wore more clothing. It’s not a case of using sex to sell bcuz If she only had tattoos on her arms, she wouldn’t need to show her stomach and could be wearing pants too. Plus it makes the concealed look that much more shocking. I think she’s beautiful and talented with and without tats but I prefer the tattooed look bcuz its an expression of her gorgeous artistic preferences and ultimately her individuality.

AND KAT’S NOT SELLING OUT by hiding her tats. Whoever has that opinion of her hasn’t seen the concealer’s page on sephora.com, where she states “I think just as much as people have the choice to be tattooed, they should also have the liberty to look whatever way they want whenever they want”. The link to the page is http://www.sephora.com/browse/product.jhtml?id=P231113&categoryId=C18697

P.S. SINNER is my scorching gourmand. Love it!

March 12th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

I think she is hot and sexy with the tattoos

August 10th, 2010 at 8:38 pm

to all of the people who think the pic without the tats was “airbrushed” or “photo-shopped”, you are all wrong. If you watched her show, you would know that it took them several hours to cover them with actual cover-up. She is promoting her make-up line and her new perfume with this photo shoot, not being a “sell-out” or whatever else you idiots think. I respest her b/c she is a strong woman who doesn’t let close-minded people’s opinions have an effect on the way SHE wants to live her life.

August 11th, 2010 at 4:09 pm

In my personal opinion with her tats covered she depicts every other underwear model. Her tattoos are what makes her who she is. To me she is more beautiful with her tattoos because they are who she is and what she enjoys doing with her life. I have the most respect for her and her work. She is a beautiful woman from head to toe. She is Kat Von D a kick a$$ tattoo artist!!!!!

September 16th, 2010 at 5:01 pm

I thinks its funny how some of you think you have the right to judge someone you dont even know. its to bad that there is not photos of you all over the place and being a kind of roll model for those who want more out of life. I bet if you had pics of you Im sure it might be easy to judge you based on what you look like or how you choose to live. my advice to you judgmental people STOP live your life try looking in the mirror. Most people judge others because they are insecure about themselves.

September 30th, 2010 at 4:33 pm

I think she is hot ither way. but for me its kinda different. as a tattoo artist myself i really like her tattoos but to see her with out them is kinda like seeing a girl with her clothes off for the first time. its neat she is beautiful but she is not the same Kat that i know and am use to. but im not here to juge i like both shots.

How to Start A Blog">How to Start A Blog
November 12th, 2010 at 1:09 am

I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve made in writing this article. I’m hoping the exact same finest work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative composing abilities have motivated me to start my own BlogEngine blog now.

February 7th, 2011 at 3:07 am

i think that the pic w/out her tatts is nice but she could be any pretty girl,her unique and inspirational gorgeousness isnt there..its boring.kat w/tatts any day.

March 13th, 2011 at 7:44 pm

OMG! Kat is hot. I didn’t even recognize her without the tatoo’s, but either way she is HOT. I am into tatoo’s and have some i wish i didn’t have but cant’ take them back and they are part of me as Kat’s tatoos are a part of her and she looks just as HOT with the tatoo’s. I am looking into her concealer for a job related purpose.

July 8th, 2011 at 8:04 am

I think she looks horrible with tats on she looks goregous non tat

August 8th, 2011 at 1:20 am

Without- beautiful
With- beautiful

They are just different kinds of beauty. No tats is softer and cleaner while with the tats is more of a rocker.

And for the record Kat did the photo shoot without tats cause the product is a tattoo concealer.

August 11th, 2011 at 6:17 pm

Camel toe on picture 2 but she is very sexy without tatts

August 11th, 2011 at 8:13 pm

She is in 2 different outfits. Shea gorgeous in both pictures but if she was in the underwear in the first picture and the second one I think she would look just as good I love her tattoos but I don’t like the outfit they got her in with the tats. She looks sexy in the picture without tats but that’s cause I like the underwear put her in that underwear wit tattoos an she will look just as sexy

August 19th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

She is indeed Beautiful without the tats but she would not be where she is without her style (which includes her body art). .. The way she really is makes her stand out in a crowd any day…

August 24th, 2011 at 3:15 pm

Shes super pretty with out any tattoos!

August 24th, 2011 at 3:40 pm

OMG Kat is beautiful with the tattoos as well as without, what makes her more beautiful is the person she is inside.She is one of a kind and we can all learn from her…

September 13th, 2011 at 9:09 am

looks beautiful either way, these tattoos are her and they are well done pieces…. she wears them beautifully!

September 17th, 2011 at 10:29 am

Yes she is beautiful with them and without them! And whatever you see on the outside does NOT make someone beautiful or ugly. It’s what’s on the inside. Plus to all of you that think it’s photo shopped y’all are dumb. If you had watched the show about it when it was going on. It showed it all. They even stated how it took over 5 hours to get it all done.

October 31st, 2011 at 8:57 pm

(timmy twitch) damn I love her body with tattoos a lot but she’s lookin good without too …DAMN! (45) !!wow!! tattoos belong to and on kat von d but she dose look incredible without

November 5th, 2011 at 8:57 am

Honestly, you all are idiots. First of all…of course She needs to be in underwear (I mean, I don’t like that kind of ads) but if she’s trying to sell a tats covering make up she have to show how it works.

2nd… I thing that her tattoos defines her, it’s true. But think about it, is refreshing to see her without them, I mean I’ve ALWAYS WONDERED how she’ll look without them.

She’s so beautiful, and I really love how she looks in the 1st picture (I’m not saying that she looks ugly with tattoos, only that she looks more clean without them)

AND FOR LAST… omg if you search on google images you can notice that she’s damn skinny (she lose weight) so, the photoshop it’s only on the quality of her skin to look softly, not to be like MORE SKINNY…

Thanks for the space :) god bless you all :* take care

November 5th, 2011 at 9:17 am

OK… I have a question? It’s bad & horrible to hide her tattoos… but it’s fine that she did a nose job and a plastic surgery. You guys need to define what “natural beauty” and “show how she really is” means, because honestly, even with her tattoos (what you guys defines as “natural” for her) she’s not natural! She’s under the hollywood pressure, to be “part of the society” and be like people want her to be.

January 4th, 2012 at 11:22 pm

damn you chicks are crazy. she looks good no matter what but you know what without the tatts its just not her. she was born to look like that and well she looks amazing. and all you tattoo haters are probably some of those stupid lil gulry gurls who gets lil hearts and butterflies on their ankles…..ahhh chicks these days

January 15th, 2012 at 7:27 pm

I think shes beautiful either way

February 23rd, 2012 at 8:03 am

She is GORGEOUS with tattoos!
It makes her KatVonD(;

makeup train case">makeup train case
February 29th, 2012 at 9:22 am

You understand thus considerably with regards to this subject, made me personally believe it from so many numerous angles. Its like women and men aren’t fascinated except it is one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs outstanding. Always handle it up!

October 12th, 2012 at 6:22 pm

Love her with Tattoos… Soo amazing!! She’s a bad ass and pretty much my idol… Would love her to tattoo me one day!! Would be a dream!!

December 27th, 2012 at 5:54 pm

Kat is gorgeous either way. However, those of you making comments about how much better she looks without tattoos are absolute idiots! She could be like the rest of the models out there, along with all you white bread, vanilla pudding, skim milk MFers. She is gorgeous with or without tattoos, but none of you would know who she is without them. This fragrance line wouldnt b what it is without them. She would be just another face. Instead she is a tattood goddess.

February 14th, 2013 at 2:17 pm

Toook me a while to read over 100 comments… And strange but true, all of you have a point, but its because its your own opinion, and no-one can say your opinion is wrong… I believe Kat is Beautiful… Without tatoos, with the tatoos she is still beautiful, we tend to look to the exterior and get fixated on specific things, like nice legs or eyes, with her its tatoos! Take a look at her whole self, and if we don’t know what her tatoos mean then we have no right to complain about it! We all have great features, just have to open your eyes and see it!

February 16th, 2013 at 1:19 am

It vill alsoe had been fun if che cut showe hau sche cut like too have the tattoos if che chut thues too day if ther was noe tattoos. Will kat still have the potret of Pixi in cullor? And is ther not enye tattoo you/Kat not like enye more/totel mistak. I think you lokke soe nice but it must also’e bee som tattoos you not wud haw to day if you cut have to day and you will had plased them a nother plase on you’r boddy. Yes, if you/Kat cutt start from scratch/0. Have due you out tere think she will like too look. FUNN, if they did a 3. picture/fotos. ( Sorry mye English I’m from Denmark/Danmark in Elsinor/Helsingør)

Beaneth Birnau Jensen">Beaneth Birnau Jensen
February 16th, 2013 at 1:25 am

Hey

May 20th, 2013 at 4:55 pm

SURGERY and AIRBRUSH are a celebrities best friend.

February 12th, 2014 at 9:02 pm

There’s A LOT of Photoshop enhancing going on on the first photo so, guys, don’t be fooled!
Tattoos are Kat’s life, her profession and it’s what makes her special and who she is. It’s ridiculous to hear people saying she’ll regret her tattoos, they’re her life!








Follow ICYDK