Star Magazine’s newest cover shows off a very thin Angelina Jolie.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 at 4:52 pm and is filed under Angelina Jolie.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
12 Responses to “Angelina Jolie really needs to eat something.”
You can so tell that that picture has been altered … she is thin these days but not that thin …..give me a break ….anyone who falls for that picture is a moron
Obviously photoshopped, and not an especilaly good job either. The left arm is terribly done, they didn’t touch the shoulder because of her tat, and you can really tell the difference. Her shoulder would never be that rounded if the rest of her arm really was that thin.
it does look touched abit to make it look so extreme. but she has lost weight. But when my husband died I lost 20 lbs in 2 1/2 weeks and it took me a year to put it back on
actually, this pic was in another magazine along with a bunch of other pics of her….it didn’t once mention weight and i remember thinking: how can they print this and not mention the fact that she looks soooo skinny? although she is incredibly skinny, i honestly this pic is all b/c of the odd angle. and as far as her “rounded” shoulder goes…that is just her body type. she has broad, muscular, swimmers shoulders. trust me, i used to be severely skinny, but still had shoulder mucles and the looked “rounded”. it can happen.
Just because you saw it in another mag, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t shopped. Paps often do some photoshopping themselves to add value to an image. It may be something as simple as cropping a picture to make it look like a certain star has a new love interest, when in fact they’re just hanging out with a bunch of other people, or it may be something like this: skinning up someone who’s already skinny or maybe a little tinkling in the belly area to simulate a bump. Those are the pictures that make the headlines, right?
As for the shoulders, I went back and looked again, and my biggest problem with what you said is that she doesn’t seem to have “shoulder muscles”, but “one shoulder muscle”. Only the muscle where the tat is looks rounded and defined, the rest of her shoulder is as skinny and bony as her whole arm.
Plus there’s this smoothness in her right arm that generally comes from less than competent photoshopping. Whoever did this forgot to retexturize the skin after they were done with the alterations.
June 20th, 2007 at 5:05 pm
You can so tell that that picture has been altered … she is thin these days but not that thin …..give me a break ….anyone who falls for that picture is a moron
June 20th, 2007 at 5:29 pm
Obviously photoshopped, and not an especilaly good job either. The left arm is terribly done, they didn’t touch the shoulder because of her tat, and you can really tell the difference. Her shoulder would never be that rounded if the rest of her arm really was that thin.
June 20th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
I agree with Denise, she was just pictured at her movie premiere and looked fantastic. These are obviously fake.
June 20th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
she looks a bit like michael jackson here-_-
June 20th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
Picture, meet photoshop.
June 20th, 2007 at 6:03 pm
and people wonder why she or her people banned certain magazines from her recent premire
June 21st, 2007 at 1:40 am
it does look touched abit to make it look so extreme. but she has lost weight. But when my husband died I lost 20 lbs in 2 1/2 weeks and it took me a year to put it back on
June 21st, 2007 at 2:38 am
actually, this pic was in another magazine along with a bunch of other pics of her….it didn’t once mention weight and i remember thinking: how can they print this and not mention the fact that she looks soooo skinny? although she is incredibly skinny, i honestly this pic is all b/c of the odd angle. and as far as her “rounded” shoulder goes…that is just her body type. she has broad, muscular, swimmers shoulders. trust me, i used to be severely skinny, but still had shoulder mucles and the looked “rounded”. it can happen.
June 21st, 2007 at 4:54 am
Just because you saw it in another mag, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t shopped. Paps often do some photoshopping themselves to add value to an image. It may be something as simple as cropping a picture to make it look like a certain star has a new love interest, when in fact they’re just hanging out with a bunch of other people, or it may be something like this: skinning up someone who’s already skinny or maybe a little tinkling in the belly area to simulate a bump. Those are the pictures that make the headlines, right?
As for the shoulders, I went back and looked again, and my biggest problem with what you said is that she doesn’t seem to have “shoulder muscles”, but “one shoulder muscle”. Only the muscle where the tat is looks rounded and defined, the rest of her shoulder is as skinny and bony as her whole arm.
Plus there’s this smoothness in her right arm that generally comes from less than competent photoshopping. Whoever did this forgot to retexturize the skin after they were done with the alterations.
June 21st, 2007 at 11:31 am
Eww that is not attractive…she looks ill
June 21st, 2007 at 12:29 pm
of course it’s photoshopped… obvious. Not too many pics land in magazines without getting photoshopped either to make it look better or worse..
July 8th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
Yes, image in this topic was photoshoped.
But look at her legs here:
http://icydk.com/2007/06/18/angelina-out-with-zahara-and-shiloh/66dgkurjpg/
They are so thin that I wonder how she managed to lift the children.
Anorexia?