Sharon Stone is firing back at a judge who claimed that she wanted her 8-year-old son Roan to receive Botox treatments for his “foot odor.”

“This week it was reported in connection with Sharon Stone’s custody dispute that she wanted to have her young 8 year-old son undergo Botox treatment at this time for his feet. Sharon Stone never made this statement. It is a complete fabrication,” her attorney Martin Singer tells Entertainment Tonight. “Sharon loves her son Roan and only wants the best for him.”

The statement comes days after a San Francisco judge claimed in new Superior Court papers that the actress, 50, “delegates many of her parenting responsibilities to third parties” and has “simply refused” to participate in counseling unless her “schedule is accommodated and her demands are met.”

“Such conduct on the part of any parent … is unacceptable and does not serve the child’s best interest,” said the judge, who added that she tends “to overreact” to many medical issues involving her son.

The judge’s remarks were a tentative statement on Stone’s motion to modify custody.

The judge has turned down Stone’s request to move her son Roan to Los Angeles, where she lives, from his father Phil Bronstein’s home in San Francisco. She is allowed visitation time with the child, including weekends and holidays.

Stone and Bronstein – who wed in 1998 – adopted Roan in 2000 and divorced in 2004.

Source

Sharon Stone is an alarmist parent who has gone off the deep end over and over, according to the judge who rejected her request to move her son down to L.A.

The court has released what it calls the “Tentative Statement of Decision.” It is a highly sensitive document, which outlines a bitter, ongoing battle between Stone and ex-husband, Phil Bronstein.

Among many things, the judge says, “Mother appears to overreact to many medical issues involving Roan.” In one case, the judge describes Stone believing Roan had a spinal condition, but “there was no evidence to support this allegation.”

And then the court says, “Another example of an overreaction is that Mother suggested that Roan should have Botox injections in his feet to resolve a problem he had with foot odor. As Father appropriately noted, the simple and common sense approach of making sure Roan wore socks with his shoes and used foot deodorant corrected the odor problem without the need for any invasive procedure on this young child.”

The judge differentiated very distinctly the difference between Bronstein and Stone, saying, “Father has championed for Roan’s well-being out of, what appears to this Court, nothing less than the unconditional love for his son. Unfortunately, and for unexplained reasons, it appears that Mother did not involve herself to the extent she could or should have in this process … Mother has attempted to put up roadblocks to Roan’s getting help, or has decided against participating in his care.”

The judge goes on: “Unfortunately, the problem caused by Mother’s overreactions is painfully real for this child.”

There are many other specifics that we won’t publish.

The judge says at one point, responding to Stone’s argument that she put her career on hold for Roan, “If Mother has, in fact, limited her career to make herself available for Roan, she has done little to make this evident to Roan, his school or this Court.”

A call to Stone’s rep was not immediately returned.

source

So sad about her son.  If you missed that story, go here!

WENN

ET has obtained a court minute order confirming Sharon Stone has lost physical custody of her child Roan, despite her court pleas to change the arrangement. According to court documents detailing a September 12, 2008 custody hearing, Phil Bronstein “shall have permanent sole physical custody of child. Court finds that Respondent (Sharon Stone) failed to meet her burden of proof and denies Respondent’s (Sharon Stone’s) request for modification of custody. The judge also notes this order is permanent unless there is a change of circumstances.

This information from a September 12th minute order is a dramatic change from a custody order obtained by ET in October of 2007 that states Stone’s ex, newspaper editor Phil Bronstein and the actress had “joint legal and physical custody” at that time. Stone and Bronstein divorced in early 2004.

Source

WENN

Sharon Stone has a new man – and he is more than half her age. Stone, 50, is reportedly dating a 24 year old Chase Dreyfous.

In Touch magazine reports Dreyfous boasted about his new romance with friends at a recent party.

A source says, “Sharon called him and he showed the caller ID to everyone… She’s really into him and even asked him to come with her to Mexico.”

Source

WENN

A man who fell and injured himself on Sharon Stone’s estate is suing the actress for unspecified damages.

Peter Krause (not the Dirty Sexy Money actor) claims he fell down a “large, concealed drop-off” while at Stone’s home in 2006, and he has been fighting pain from his injured ever since. But the Basic Instinct star and her aides are baffled about the lawsuit – because they have no idea who the guy is.

A representative tells TMZ.com, “There’s no record of this individual being on the property and likewise there’s no record reporting this individual being injured on the property. Neither Ms. Stone or her attorneys have seen a copy of this complaint.”

Source

WENN