Gwyneth Paltrow’s latest Goop newsletter offers up advice for updating your spring closet – for $500K!
 |
Update your Spring wardrobe for only $500,000!! No biggie, right? Well not if you’re Gwyneth Paltrow!
In her latest Goop article, the 40-year-old actress poses in a series of designer outfits for occasions like work, cocktail parties, dinners and casual weekends. The clothes, which all come from Net-a-porter, are meant as “inspiration for outfits for all aspects of your busy life.”
One outfit which she recommends for ‘a nighttime occasion’ consists of a $425 white leather crop-top from Theyksens’ Theory, shiny orange Maiyet shorts for $475, a $925 leopard print Charlotte Olympia clutch and Jimmy Choo heels for $575.
She accessorizes the bright ensemble with a $795 Swarovski crystal necklace and a $1,590 bangle bracelet from Saint Laurent.
For ‘a night in with guests’, the mother-of-two suggests a maxi skirt, which she pairs with a plain grey tank top.
The satin and tulle skirt she models goes for $1,615 from Temperley London, while the racer-back T by Alexander Wang top is a more affordable $77.
To keep the look casual, Ms Paltrow wears flat shoes – a $945 pair of Charlotte Olympia sandals.
And for weekend lounging, the star opts for a slouchy look – silky trousers, a loose sweatshirt and army green sneakers.
The sweatshirt – from Saint Laurent – costs $675, her shoes are $600 Isabel Marant ankle boots, and the silk Chloe pants cost $1,695.
The blonde tops off her casual look with $760 worth of jewelry.
For daytime basics, the actress suggests pastels including a dusty pink T-shirt from Lanvin for $675.
She compliments her girly top with a $265 pair of matching pink Paul and Joe shorts. And to keep the outfit conservative, she sports a $625 white button-down beneath her short-sleeved top.
Okay, I get it, I get it. Gwyneth is super annoying. I read this Goop newsletter when it came in yesterday, and I thought what a pretentious b**ch. Seriously, who can afford this stuff? It’s blatantly obvious that most people CANNOT afford it. And the people who could…do they read her newsletter?
I think most of these clothes are super cute, and sure, in an ideal life I would have Gwyneth Paltrow’s body and Gwyneth Paltrow’s checking account. But I don’t. I think this newsletter would have come across much better had she modeled outfits from Old Navy and H&M. Cute clothes that people can actually afford.
Who’s with me!
Tags: celebrity, Fashion, GOOP, Gwyneth Paltrow, Hollywood, newsletter
March 22nd, 2013 at 7:58 am
GAG, all 3 of those outfits are UGLY. I’m glad I’m not rich?
March 22nd, 2013 at 8:13 am
I’m with you on that! Or maybe she could have done a section showing off comparable outfits at affordable prices.
March 22nd, 2013 at 11:20 am
She is so disgusting to put stuff out there like this. There are more of us who can’t afford this stuff than there are of her — who can. She sucks.
March 22nd, 2013 at 3:55 pm
I feel like the more she talks and “tries to relate” the more off-putting she’s becoming. I guess I’ve never understood why people spend so much on these things.
March 23rd, 2013 at 12:03 pm
OMG. I am with you. I thought the same thing and couldn’t believe that newsletter. Now, I love GP, but that newsletter made me think that she is just CLUELESS. Did she really think that through? Kinda disappointing.