Lucky Magazine apologizes for Britney’s horrific wig on their November cover.

Comments 0
Posted by:

Britney Spears covered the November issue of Lucky Magazine, and from the very beginning everyone (myself included) commented on how horrible Brit looked. She IS almost unrecognizable. The wig is so bad, there’s no room for doubt that it’s not her real hair. Why would a magazine greenlight such horrible pics?

After receiving immense backlash online, Lucky released an apology for the pics.

Despite some questionable behavior in the past, Britney Spears has managed to maintain a remarkably loyal fan base. So loyal, in fact, that an army of her devotees lept to Brit’s defense after Lucky magazine’s cover shoot with the singer didn’t exactly resemble the pop star they know and love.

It’s not uncommon for a glossy’s cover to receive less-than-stellar reviews, since everyone seems to have their own opinions on what looks best on celebrities. But Lucky received an unusually-fierce backlash from fans accusing the mag of putting an unflattering wig on the “X-Factor” judge and excessive use of retouching. The retaliation method of choice? Twitter.

Brit aficionados took to the social networking site to chastise Lucky for putting the 30-year-old in a “horrendous wig” and making her look unrecognizable. “Did @britneyspears even show up for the photoshoot or did you just photoshop her face on a body[?]” a fan tweeted at the magazine. Ouch!

Unable to ignore the poor reviews on Twitter, Lucky apologized to readers, tweeting, “We’re sorry to have let some of you down.”



Posted by:
Monday, October 29th, 2012 at 8:08am
Filed under Britney Spears | No Comments


Add Your Comment

  • First-time commenter? A confirmation email will be sent to you after you post your comment.

  • Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Follow ICYDK