Denise Richards accuses Charlie Sheen of molesting their children
Denise Richards went too far when she falsely accused her ex, Charlie Sheen, of molesting their daughters – and now Sheen will move for full custody of the kids by charging that their mother is a liar.
Richards dragged Sheen into a Los Angeles courtroom early last week for a mysterious “emergency” child-custody hearing to screen videos of their girls, Sam and Lola, supposedly acting in strange and disturbing ways. Sheen’s lawyers – who got the “evidence” dismissed – presented their own videos of the girls acting normally at his house.
A source said, “Denise’s accusations were vile. She was basically trying to say Charlie [manipulated] the kids and acted inappropriately with them. It’s disgusting and totally untrue. Charlie is furious . . . Denise has really pushed it too far this time.
“She came after Charlie because the ratings on her E! reality show ['It's Complicated'] have tanked and they were threatening not to renew,” the source said.
“She thinks a court battle would be good for ratings so she wants all overnight visits with the girls ceased, and monitored visits with her nanny. She invited the media circus to the hearing and even wanted reporters in the judge’s chambers – which wasn’t allowed. It’s ridiculous.”
Sheen is said to be so furious, he’s “out to prove Denise’s lack of veracity and sue her in civil court for defamation. Then he’ll sue for child custody.
“Sheen feels Richards has defamed him, especially after she denied sending [current wife] Brooke an e-mail in which she claims to want his sperm for another child. Richards says the e-mail is a fake. Sheen claims he has the e-mail and is getting forensic computer geeks to verify its authenticity.
“Charlie has now been forced to take a stand and do what’s best for the girls,” our insider said. Reps for Richards and Sheen declined comment.
WENN
July 28th, 2008 at 10:51 am
The girl is seriously disturbed.
July 28th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
if she truly did falsely accuse him, then that is shameful. But… most men would say that if you accused them. Those girls are very small and if she picks up on strange behavior, I would hope she has a therapist to back her up. There are people who are trained with small children to pick up the clues. Since charlie has such a sexual perverse background, I would not be surprised if this is true, or if he is doing things in front of the children, not necessarily TO them, which is a form of abuse in itself. I will wait to hear more about this story, but if there is a shred of truth to this, I hope denise fights tool and nail for her kids. It seems like so many people are on charlies side when they dont know the whole story.
July 28th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I hope for the sake of the girls she is lying.
July 28th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
I watch her show and I was surprised to actually like her. I think he’s probably a skum bag from his past behavior through out the years.
I believe her, not him.
July 28th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Me, too, Blair. But I think we are the only ones…! He’s the one with the history, not her. And she is very candid and real on her show. Just my take on it.
July 30th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
It’s interesting that inspite of what’s written in this report; everyone takes Denise Richard’s side. The courts take child abuse VERY seriously and will error on the side of over caution.
The FACT that her evidence and case was thrown out says volumes. And yet you all want to believe this woman!?!
SHE IS A LAIR!!!! REMEBER she stole her best friend’s husband a few months ago.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
i cannot see why anyone would take denise richards side. i think its very obvious that she just wants attention. you know…it is possible for women to molest kids. its not just men. im a woman and i dont think men are monsters.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:56 am
I think she is soooo boring.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:24 pm
She didn’t steal her best friend’s husband. They were already broken up and the women were ever best friends in the first place. Geeez.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Charlie Sheen’s promiscuos past was involving grown women whom he had sexual, consensual relations with. Whether they were girlfriends or prostitutes doesn’t matter because that does not in any way make him a child molester. Child molester’s have specific patterns and traits. Stop speculating that he is doing things in front of the children or making a big deal about his past. That comment in itself is defamation of his character.
August 3rd, 2008 at 8:32 pm
hayve you seen her show she sounds a little craz
August 4th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
She’s a crazy, munipulative twit who ought to have her children taken away – she’s the one victimizing her children to further her own agenda. What a cow.
August 7th, 2008 at 10:52 am
One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in “acting out” behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Unless you are FORENSIC expert, you have no expertise to make any comments about whether or not Denis is a boldfaced liar or Sheen an abuser. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism,, blatantly abusive emails to the mother of his children; etc.) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the “woman scorned” because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, “inconclusive” or “unsubstantiated” does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn’t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn’t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi. Thus, it matters not what YOU believe despite the fact that the allegation may be “unsubstantiated” or “inconclusive.” That does not mean the accusation is FALSE per se. Be careful.