The Cover Wars!

people_baby_covers.jpg

Nicole Richie didn’t just beat rival Christina Aguilera to the delivery room by having daughter Harlow on Jan. 11, one day before Aguilera gave birth to son Max, but it appears Richie will beat Aguilera on the newsstand as well.

Both new moms each had their own cover of People magazine, and according to some early estimates, the issue featuring Richie is on target to sell more than 1.8 million copies, according to an industry source, whereas Aguilera has far less. (People magazine could not confirm sales numbers; a spokesperson said its too soon to know how many copies were sold.)

Why does there seem to be more interest in Harlow Winter Kate Madden? One magazine insider said part of it could come down to the moms’ fan bases. “Christina historically doesn’t do that well on covers,” said the source, who cites poor sales of her wedding photo issue in OK!, and less-than-stellar sales of her nude photo shoot in the January 2008 Marie Claire.
That might be true, but Nicole Richie doesn’t seem like an obvious home run on the cover, either. “There’s also a greater element of curiosity with Nicole,” the source conceded. “She’s gone public about being a heroin addict. Her boyfriend is covered in tattoos. By default, she’s got the more interesting baby. People want to see how she settles down. They want to see what kind of baby someone with her [life] background has.”

Hackett won’t discuss actual figures but says, “These numbers are grossly inaccurate” and often “come from competitors who wanted the pictures and didn’t get them. You can almost set your watch to ‘I heard you paid …’ ”

For Christina Aguilera and son Max, the figure that popped up was $1.5 million, and People was scrutinized in reports that said the issue, dated Feb. 25, undersold. Hackett counters: “I am thrilled with Christina. It was a solid performer and not under expectations. I would buy Christina’s pictures again in a second.”

5 Responses to “The Cover Wars!”

  1. Amber Says:

    For me Christina tries too hard, she’s all “in your face with my big tits and butt.”

    Who cares. Sleaze is so over.

  2. Polly Says:

    I imagine the fact that Nicole is on the Oscar edition doesn’t hurt.

  3. Uglygirl Says:

    THis is BEYOND ridiculous! I can wait til the child is a year old–or older…I DOn’T need to see THE newborn.

  4. ME Says:

    personally i liked Christina’s pics better.

  5. Anonymous Says:

    I like Nicoles picture better. It is down to earth and maternal. Christina’s looks like a diva holding a baby. I am not saying she is not maternal, or putting her down at all, the picture just does not say much to me.

Leave a Reply

Powered by MyPagerank.Net
Amy Winehouse
Angelina Jolie
Ashlee Simpson
Ashley Olsen
Ashley Tisdale
Beyonce
Brad Pitt
Britney Spears
Cameron Diaz
Carrie Underwood
Charlize Theron
Christina Aguilera
Clive Owen
Daniel Craig
David Beckham
Demi Moore
Dita Von Teese
Drew Barrymore
Ellen Page
Eva Longoria
Fergie
George Clooney
Gisele Bundchen
Gwen Stefani
Halle Berry
Hayden Panettiere
Heath Ledger
Jake Gyllenhaal
James McAvoy
Jamie Lynn Spears
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jennifer Lopez
Jessica Alba
Jessica Biel
Jessica Simpson
John Mayer
Johnny Depp
Josh Duhamel
Josh Hartnett
Julia Roberts
Justin Timberlake
Kate Hudson
Katherine Heigl
Katie Holmes
Keira Knightley
Kirsten Dunst
Leonardo DiCaprio
Lindsay Lohan
Mary Kate Olsen
Matt Damon
Matthew McConaughey
Miley Cyrus
Naomi Watts
Nicole Kidman
Nicole Richie
Orlando Bloom
Paris Hilton
Penelope Cruz
Rachel McAdams
Reese Witherspoon
Renee Zellweger
Ryan Gosling
Ryan Reynolds
Sarah Michelle Gellar
Scarlett Johannson
Shia Labeouf
Sienna Miller
Tom Cruise
Victoria Beckham
ALL OTHERS...