18 Responses to “Angelina Jolie in Armando Gallo portraits for “Beowulf””

1. JJ Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 1:08 pm

   I guess its just me. I dont see anything special. she looks like she is 40 years old.

2. Kris Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 1:11 pm

   JJ I so agree with you, I have never seen her beauty. She just annoys me.

3. Uglygirl Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 1:44 pm

   She DOES look MUCH older than 32!

4. Nat Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 2:46 pm

   I kind of disagree she is absolutely stunning

5. Beckett Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 3:05 pm

   I see nothing special as well. She is attractive but not stunning by any means. I would peg her for 40 as well.

6. someone Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 3:24 pm

   She doesn’t look bad in these photos, but she does look older than 32.

7. just sayin Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 4:01 pm

   Have you people seen other actresses her age? charlize, drew, kate winslet? They all look older than 32.

8. stickaforkinher Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 4:03 pm

   maybe she looks older becuz we are used to seeing so much Photoshop. no one bothered the brush out the vein in her forehead.

9. judy Says:
   November 13th, 2007 at 4:35 pm

   She is pretty, but stunning? Absolutely not.
   There are so many beautiful women in the world, that she doesn’t come close to.
   People certainly have forgotten her past. I guess Paris and Lindsay and Britney can still reach saint status when they start adopting children across the country. They may forget Paris driving with a suspended liscense since they forget Angies heroin past, or making out with her brother. Good times.

10. nona Says:
    November 13th, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    meoooowwwwww………..

11. Sheely Says:
    November 13th, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    I think at least she looks natural. Not “done up”. And she looks her age. We’re used to so much damn photoshop that if anyone has any “imperfections” we suddenly think they’re old. They must be the same people that automatically assume a woman’s preggers if she has any protuberation whatsoever in her tummy area. God forbid a woman gets bloated or has gas!!!

12. MsCarla Says:
    November 13th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    Oh, she looks marvelous here; intelligent, happy, peaceful and compassionate. I like her much better now than when she was younger though she’s always been a unique beauty.

13. Anonymous Says:
    November 13th, 2007 at 8:50 pm

    Gorgeous!!!

14. Sway Says:
    November 13th, 2007 at 11:24 pm

    So gorgeous…:) Beautiful. Natural. Amazing.

15. Maria Says:
    November 14th, 2007 at 7:30 am

    I think society is unfortunately getting all too used to “plastic”, immobile-thanks-to-botox faces and can’t recognize natural, utter beauty when it is right in front of them.
    She’s stunning, completely!

16. Dani Says:
    November 14th, 2007 at 8:32 am

    I agree with JJ, Kris etc - nothing special at all. Pale, pasty, bony.. (check out her wrist). Her side profile resembles a rubber duck

17. I'm a hater Says:
    November 14th, 2007 at 11:28 am

    Nope. She is truly beautiful. She really is. She looks lovely and womanly and feminine and classicly gorgeous.

18. cosmo Says:
    November 14th, 2007 at 7:21 pm

    photoshop. Still old and haggard looking.

Leave a Reply