This entry was posted
on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 3:15 pm and is filed under Maggie Gyllenhaal.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
14 Responses to “First look at Maggie Gyllenhaal for Agent Provocateur!”
I find her repulsive…I don’t know why. I get bad vibes and heebie jeebies when I look at photos of her. I also don’t think she has anything remotely interesting coming out of her mouth. Not exactly sure what her appeal is.
She’s fug, I wonder if she was trying to conceal stretchmarks in these pics, seems like it. It also seems like NO celebs who were preggors EVER have stretchmarks. I wonder what the secret is
She is intelligent, and was nominated for an Academy Award. At least Maggie isn’t a skank coke whore, a porn queen, or full of silicone. She is the real deal. I guess no-one likes authentic beauty anymore!
Some of you people are so clueless, what do you want, another banal Barbie doll I suppose… Maggie is absolutely STUNNING (yes, and smart)- the term “Jolie-Laide” may be lost on Barbie fans, but it was made for Maggie. She’s looking a decent weight too. I could almost spank the monkey over these, but somehow not quite – this is probably why I’m totally in love with MG! WE WANT MAGGIE GYLENHALL NOT SLAGGY PILLS-N’ALL
Don't miss any of the action this year at the SBG Global sportsbook! SBG offers live super bowl betting odds, unique wagering options, numerous sports betting prop wagers and more!
September 1st, 2007 at 3:45 pm
I find her repulsive…I don’t know why. I get bad vibes and heebie jeebies when I look at photos of her. I also don’t think she has anything remotely interesting coming out of her mouth. Not exactly sure what her appeal is.
September 1st, 2007 at 3:53 pm
Butter face…ewww
September 1st, 2007 at 3:54 pm
I like her. She’s very unique and interesting. She looks great.
September 1st, 2007 at 4:00 pm
she looks creepy in the first picture
September 1st, 2007 at 7:03 pm
yeeesh! she reminds me of old furniture and not antique!
September 1st, 2007 at 8:03 pm
She looks great in those pics but her eyes are so weird, especially in the first pic.
September 1st, 2007 at 8:38 pm
She’s fug, I wonder if she was trying to conceal stretchmarks in these pics, seems like it. It also seems like NO celebs who were preggors EVER have stretchmarks. I wonder what the secret is
September 1st, 2007 at 10:54 pm
She’s so damn ugly!
September 2nd, 2007 at 2:21 am
Ewww. That’s just awful. It’s like a photo of someone’s grandmother. Bad move, Agent Provoke-pah-tooie.
September 2nd, 2007 at 8:40 am
Photoshop does wonders but even it has limits. This chick is still ugly.
September 2nd, 2007 at 11:31 am
I KNEW these would be phenomenal! She looks so feline and glamourous.
September 2nd, 2007 at 11:59 am
She is intelligent, and was nominated for an Academy Award. At least Maggie isn’t a skank coke whore, a porn queen, or full of silicone. She is the real deal. I guess no-one likes authentic beauty anymore!
September 3rd, 2007 at 10:38 pm
Seriously, she’s gorgeous
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:42 am
Some of you people are so clueless, what do you want, another banal Barbie doll I suppose… Maggie is absolutely STUNNING (yes, and smart)- the term “Jolie-Laide” may be lost on Barbie fans, but it was made for Maggie. She’s looking a decent weight too. I could almost spank the monkey over these, but somehow not quite – this is probably why I’m totally in love with MG! WE WANT MAGGIE GYLENHALL NOT SLAGGY PILLS-N’ALL