Bridget Moynahan to Tom Brady: Take a hike
The arrival of a beautiful baby boy has not eased the bad blood between exes Bridget Moynahan and Tom Brady.
The New England Patriots QB flew to Los Angeles by private jet last week for the birth of his son, John Edward Thomas Moynahan.
“Tom was only allowed to see the baby for a short time,” says a West Coast spy. “Bridget would not see him herself.” Moynahan’s publicist said in a statement: “Bridget is very thankful for a happy baby, excited about being a mother, and very pleased that the father, Tom Brady, was able to be there for the birth.”
But our source says: “He was only allowed to come after the baby was born. The woman would not see him, period. And she gave the baby her last name.”
The model/actress and Brady split last year after three years of dating. News of the pregnancy emerged just after Brady began a relationship with Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen.
“[Tom] is waiting to find out when he can see the little guy again,” says the snitch. “Bridget is not giving him any slack on this at all.”
Yesterday, her spokesman said Brady and Moynahan were “together” at the hospital, but couldn’t say if he was in the room during the birth. “Bridget and Tom are on speaking terms and have the best interests of the child at heart,” he said.
August 30th, 2007 at 1:50 pm
GO BRIDGET!!
August 30th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
serves him right.
August 30th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
Bridget is behaving badly. Just because the man didn’t want her doesn’t mean he should be deprived of seeing his kid. What a typical bitch she is, can’t have the man so punishes him for not wanting her. People should learn that children should not be used in these silly games. The child is being punished because the father stopped loving her. Tom never gave any indication that he didn’t want the child. He just didn’t want Bridget. What was he supposed to do marry her because she was having his baby? Children don’t make bad relationships better they just prolong the enivitable. Bridget sucks big time.
August 30th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
Oh, Rosa, you need a reality check, honey. Bridget isn’t the one behaving badly. The last time I checked, it took two people to make a baby. Just because he “doesn’t want her” doesn’t make her the bad guy. They had a baby together, and he should have hung around instead moving on to the next beautiful girl he could find. And yes, people usually get married when they are expecting a baby together. Doesn’t mean they have to get married, but if you want to talk about what is best for the child, then get your statistics straight.
August 31st, 2007 at 7:55 am
Blondey, you sound pathetic, the kind of woman who would want a man who is no longer interested in you. Please, Reese Witherspoon did the same thing and the marriage still ended. The point that you are missing is that children are not a reason to stay together. All of you angry bitchy women who feel Bridget is right I feel sorry for any children you have. Using the child as a tool to vent your revenge. Shades of Kim Basinger and Alec Baldwin. How is her behavior good for the child? Get you head out of you uterus just because a woman gives birth doesn’t make her a freaking saint.
August 31st, 2007 at 10:32 am
They both need to do what is best for the baby. He has right to see HIS baby. It not about her any more.