This entry was posted
on Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 at 11:38 am and is filed under Britney Spears.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
21 Responses to “Britney Spears needs longer shorts.”
When are you Britney fans going to realize that her pictures ARE NOT PHOTOSHOPPED!!! Take a moment of silence, do whatever you gotta do - but get over it! She’s not the same anymore!
No, true that she isn’t the same JOCELYN but…..
We have seen HUNDREDS, THOUSANDS of photos of her thighs and never have we seen deep cellulite on the front of them.
I merely was just making a comment above…not trying to be berated or belittled for it.
Sorry I pissed in your cheerios today.
I do however, love your site! You do a great job!
Trish - it’s NOT photoshopped… and I just think it’s really funny when everyone starts freaking out saying that poor ol’ Britney MUST have been photoshopped because she’s got cellulite. It’s not fake… And I didn’t belittle you…
There just comes a point when you guys have to realize that Britney’s CHANGED…the girl HAS cellulite… and the pictures are NOT FAKE.
whatever. even if it is real, no reason to say she needs to cover it up - if that is what the title is implying. Yes, I do agree the shorts are too short, but no need to cover up nature’s revenge. Every normal woman has some.
Thousands of photos of Britney’s thighs taken from far away, sitting down, or covered by fishnet stockings (which are basically the pics we’ve seen of her in recent weeks since her release from rehab) offer no proof as to whether or not she has cellulite. These close-up photos, however, do. She has cellulite. Period. It doesn’t make her a bad person or diminish her chances of a comeback. She simply needs to regain her former work ethic and concentrate on her career, her body, and mostly her children and she can certainly obtain her famous body once again.
she had knee surgery a couple of years ago that accounts for the honked knees…and she does have cellulite…ftr, it can be on the front, back, sides of one’s legs not just limited to the back of legs…
I’m a photographer, I have photoshopped thousands of pictures. And, I have to say that those pictures look VERY suspicious. I would put money on the fact that they are photoshopped.
And no, I’m not a fan or a hater. I’m neutral. But photoshopping is my profession so in my opinion these pictures are doctored.
Again, not the same picture - and this picture is in the shade… so obviously the cellulite wouldn’t show. I’d like someone to show me the same photograph NOT photoshopped.
I cannot stand Britney. However, the legs on that pic have been altered. Look at the contrast between the background and the legs - you can see where they have been cropped, cut , pasted and inserted into the pic.
June 13th, 2007 at 11:43 am
She needs to wear capris.
June 13th, 2007 at 11:44 am
THIS HAS BEEN DOCTERED…photoshopped! We have seen her thighs a thousand times and this is NOT what they look like.
June 13th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
When are you Britney fans going to realize that her pictures ARE NOT PHOTOSHOPPED!!! Take a moment of silence, do whatever you gotta do - but get over it! She’s not the same anymore!
June 13th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
No, true that she isn’t the same JOCELYN but…..
We have seen HUNDREDS, THOUSANDS of photos of her thighs and never have we seen deep cellulite on the front of them.
I merely was just making a comment above…not trying to be berated or belittled for it.
Sorry I pissed in your cheerios today.
I do however, love your site! You do a great job!
June 13th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
The fine wrinkles above the knee look fake. I can’t stand Britney, never been able to since day one, but I’m pretty sure that’s been photoshopped.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:09 pm
It is so sad when everything that used to be tight starts to sag and then everyone takes pictures.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Trish - it’s NOT photoshopped… and I just think it’s really funny when everyone starts freaking out saying that poor ol’ Britney MUST have been photoshopped because she’s got cellulite. It’s not fake… And I didn’t belittle you…
There just comes a point when you guys have to realize that Britney’s CHANGED…the girl HAS cellulite… and the pictures are NOT FAKE.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
whatever. even if it is real, no reason to say she needs to cover it up - if that is what the title is implying. Yes, I do agree the shorts are too short, but no need to cover up nature’s revenge. Every normal woman has some.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
i think what she needs is bra.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:34 pm
real, photoshopped, whatever - that shit looks gross either way. what’s with the bulge over her knee? someone owes me lunch because i just lost mine.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Take it easy, tiger Trish. no is berating you or belittling you.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
Thousands of photos of Britney’s thighs taken from far away, sitting down, or covered by fishnet stockings (which are basically the pics we’ve seen of her in recent weeks since her release from rehab) offer no proof as to whether or not she has cellulite. These close-up photos, however, do. She has cellulite. Period. It doesn’t make her a bad person or diminish her chances of a comeback. She simply needs to regain her former work ethic and concentrate on her career, her body, and mostly her children and she can certainly obtain her famous body once again.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
Well…I sure as heck didn’t say Poor Ol’ Britney.
Its just funny how her photos are exaggerated to the point of being udderly hilarious.
Thanks for your input though. Like I said I love coming to visit your site. Its alot of fun. I may keep my opinions to myself from now on.
June 13th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
she had knee surgery a couple of years ago that accounts for the honked knees…and she does have cellulite…ftr, it can be on the front, back, sides of one’s legs not just limited to the back of legs…
June 13th, 2007 at 5:44 pm
I’m a photographer, I have photoshopped thousands of pictures. And, I have to say that those pictures look VERY suspicious. I would put money on the fact that they are photoshopped.
And no, I’m not a fan or a hater. I’m neutral. But photoshopping is my profession so in my opinion these pictures are doctored.
June 13th, 2007 at 6:17 pm
http://www.imnotobsessed.com/?viewimg=13181
Here’s the non-photoshopped photo.
June 13th, 2007 at 6:29 pm
Kyle - that’s not even the same picture. ??? That makes no sense.
June 13th, 2007 at 6:45 pm
Just aother pic to show that this photo has been altered.
http://popsugar.com/gallery/79645?page=0,0,1
June 14th, 2007 at 12:34 am
Again, not the same picture - and this picture is in the shade… so obviously the cellulite wouldn’t show. I’d like someone to show me the same photograph NOT photoshopped.
June 14th, 2007 at 12:46 am
I cannot stand Britney. However, the legs on that pic have been altered. Look at the contrast between the background and the legs - you can see where they have been cropped, cut , pasted and inserted into the pic.
June 14th, 2007 at 6:38 pm
If anyone eats as much junk as Britney does they’re bound to get cellulite. Drink more water Brit!!