20 Responses to “Rachel McAdams in Elle US April 2007”

1. b Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 10:31 am

   Notice that her hair and face are EXACTLY the same in the first and second pictures? I wonder what happened that caused them to have to cut and paste like that.

2. Brittney Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 11:30 am

   I noticed that too!

3. BB Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 12:24 pm

   haha i noticed to. I dont think they cut and pasted, she prolly just used the same face! but she looks so much better in that Chanel gown than Kirsten did!

4. Hannah Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 12:37 pm

   The first dress looks better on Rachel. Kirsten’s dress looks good on no one.

5. Kates Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 1:37 pm

   I think she looks better in both dresses than the actresses that wore them to the Oscars. She looks great, pink hair and all!

6. gavin elster Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 2:21 pm

   Wow what an odd photoshop job this is. I didn’t notice it until I read “b”’s comment.
   Really… what happened to the photo and who said it was acceptible to cut and paste her head?

7. Anonymous Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 9:37 pm

   what the eff is with the pink shit in her hair? i think she looks so much better when its dark

8. Damn I'm Cute Says:
   March 4th, 2007 at 9:43 pm

   She’s pretty alright. I just couldn’t help but think about the fact that she could play the younger sis of Jennifer Garner and Hillary Swank in any given movie. There’s just something masculine about her looks.

9. Angy Says:
   March 5th, 2007 at 6:05 am

   I hated that dress on Kirsten Dunst, but she can carry it. She looks great, including her pink hair.

10. holland Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 6:39 am

    in most pictures she looks like she has no neck at all…
    or is it just me??

    btw what is she famous for?? I don’t know who she is, i’m from holland.. hahaha
    I totally agree with “b”..

11. Jen Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 7:23 am

    that is a really weird photoshop job… you think they’d just reshoot it instead of making her look deformed

12. missamerica79 Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 9:06 am

    She looks the friggin same in every pic…LOL

13. CUCU Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 9:15 am

    She’s famous because she’s an actress,a really good one actually,she has been in movies like Mean girls (with Lindsay Lohan),The Notebook (classic) and Wedding crashers,I don’t know in what planet you live in.

14. DirtyRottenGossip.com Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Wow. I don’t even know where to begin. How about the horrible photoshop, or the horrible lighting, or the horrible clothes? Who took these, some high school kid with a kodak?

15. noname Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    I LOVEEEEEEE RACHEL MCADAMS. she is by far the most GORGEOUS girl ever.

16. Mina Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    Wow, not a single one of those dresses is wearable.

17. Latina Says:
    March 6th, 2007 at 10:59 am

    in what year did Kristen wear that dress? I’ve been looking for the pic for my blog and can’t find it!!

18. Dawn Says:
    March 11th, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    SHE LOOKS GOOD IN EVERYTHING. She would look good in a SUIT!

19. HVZ Says:
    April 6th, 2007 at 11:12 am

    The pictures were taken in Paris. Fashion Week. Of course they aren’t wearable it’s fashion. I also live in Holland and I know who she is. I think she looks amazing! And that is her real hair. She had the pink before she did the shoot. Down to earth and doesn’t care what people say! I love it!!!

20. Tiff Says:
    April 22nd, 2007 at 12:43 am

    I think she looks gorgeous! I love the hair and outfits espcially the dress with all the flowers on it. She is pretty and she has alot of money so it doesn’t matter what anyone thinks, no one is making money like her.

Leave a Reply. May take a few minutes to appear.

You can Register for faster commenting!