HotLinks

Stacy Keibler has officially been replaced (DListed)

Watch Whitney Houston's final performance! (Too Fab)

Kim Kardashian in her most revealing dress ever? (Superficial)

Halle Berry and Olivier Martinez finally engaged! (Too Fab)

Scarlett Johansson hits the beach in a bikini! (Superficial)

18 Responses to “Chloe Sevigny at the “Zodiac” premiere in Los Angeles Premiere, March 1”

1. ali Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 3:03 pm

   Am I the only one that thinks pockets in evening gowns and cocktail dresses are just plain wrong?

2. GirlGlobal Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 3:08 pm

   that is a very ill-fitting unflattering dress – her boobs are getting pushed into her back! and yes, pockets and an evening dress don’t mix!

3. gavin elster Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 3:09 pm

   Its wrong when its done Wrong. Damn if doenst look like she shops at Tranny’s R Us.

4. anonamomma Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 3:22 pm

   Again with the pockets, the effing pockets, Lord help us all!

5. misha Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 4:03 pm

   i just find chloe sooo unattractive! i mean, i think its cool that she’s not perpetuating the whole super skinny blonde bimbo look.. but idk, i just dont like her.

6. Anonymous Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 4:41 pm

   Here’s my issue… (since you asked)

   I don’t mind the pockets, I can see the benefit. But take your damn hands out of them for 15 min while you walk the red carpet. The pockets are irrelevant, they are not (or should not be) fashion. The whole “LOOK, I’ve got pockets so I’m going to put my hands in them while I walk the carpet” is very ‘look at me I need attention.’

7. Anonymous Says:
   March 2nd, 2007 at 4:42 pm

   I don’t care about having pockets, I can see the benefit. There’s just no need to put your hands in them while you walk the red carpet.

8. jana Says:
   March 3rd, 2007 at 1:14 am

   I see I’m the only one… but I think she looks fantastic! Plus, she is a great actress.

9. Anonymous Says:
   March 3rd, 2007 at 4:44 am

   i like the pockets but this particular dress looks like a big heart-shaped box of valentines day chocolates.

10. Anon Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 6:06 am

    She’s a cool girl and always pushing the envelope, which I think is great, but the dress doesn’t work. Too much of everything.

11. Hels Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 10:43 am

    i wonder what kind of strapless bra makes her boobs stand up so much…
    tape?

12. orlandogirl Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 10:55 am

    I dont´care what she´s wearing. I like her. She´s sooo cool.

13. ... Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    Orlandogirl: That’s Chloe’s problem — she thinks it’s cool not to care how she looks so she usually looks ridiculous. I think she has a lot of potential, but every time I see a photo of her I cringe. She almost always has her hair pulled back like a teenager, and the clothes she (or her “stylist”) chooses never fit right, are wacky colors and/or are wrinkled beyond belief. She could shop off the rack and look better — if she wanted to.

14. Carol Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    She looks like Judy Jetson.

15. Meow_town Says:
    March 3rd, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    She’s in HBO’s “Big Love” GREAT show.

16. Emily Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 2:36 am

    I don’t mind pockets in an evening gown as long as they are well hidden in the folds (I like the idea of being able to sneak a key or lipgloss in there), BUT IT LOOKS TACKY TO KEEP YOUR HANDS TUCKED IN THEM.

17. Dani Says:
    March 5th, 2007 at 7:33 am

    Chloe is awesome, great actress, beautiful, love the way she dreses and this dress is great and the pockets rock (with her hands in them too)

18. i was there Says:
    March 20th, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    did you think that perhaps it was SO cold out that she didn’t want to take her hands out? i think its cute and makes for comfort when standing in front of 1239290 taking your picture.

Leave a Reply. May take a few minutes to appear.

You can Register for faster commenting!