This entry was posted
on Monday, January 15th, 2007 at 12:29 pm and is filed under Britney Spears.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
8 Responses to “Wait – is that Britney – WITH her kid?”
Ridiculously pathetic photo op. I think Britney may be slightly retarded. If she wants the world to think she’s a good mom, she should just go out and play “for real” with her kids…not put on a dress and heels, and carry a stupid designer bag while prancing around in the sand with her kid. What a waste.
she looks like the younger, retarded sister of the Hansel & Gretel witch, feeling up the kid’s legs to see how plump they are… you can just see the drool pooling in the corners of her mouth as she assesses his potential juiciness. It’s actually quite a frightening picture.
O stop hating on her! If its not one thing its another, with everyone always talking negative about her! Maybe if she could live a normal life, without cameras following her every move, she would be able to take her kids out more safely.
Maybe if she didn’t want to be a famous pop star and fame-whore, she would have had a chance at a normal life (in a trailer park). As it is, she CHOSE to attempt to become famous – she ASPIRED to being famous. Ergo, she now has to deal with the results of that desired and acquired fame and fortune.
Everyone would stop ‘talking negative about her’ if she stopped behaving in a negative manner. There are quite a few famous people who manage to raise their children quite decently, while still living in the public eye. Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Garner, Kate Beckinsdale and Teri Hatcher come to mind…
January 15th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Ridiculously pathetic photo op. I think Britney may be slightly retarded. If she wants the world to think she’s a good mom, she should just go out and play “for real” with her kids…not put on a dress and heels, and carry a stupid designer bag while prancing around in the sand with her kid. What a waste.
January 15th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
she looks like the younger, retarded sister of the Hansel & Gretel witch, feeling up the kid’s legs to see how plump they are… you can just see the drool pooling in the corners of her mouth as she assesses his potential juiciness. It’s actually quite a frightening picture.
January 15th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
O stop hating on her! If its not one thing its another, with everyone always talking negative about her! Maybe if she could live a normal life, without cameras following her every move, she would be able to take her kids out more safely.
January 15th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
Maybe if she didn’t want to be a famous pop star and fame-whore, she would have had a chance at a normal life (in a trailer park). As it is, she CHOSE to attempt to become famous – she ASPIRED to being famous. Ergo, she now has to deal with the results of that desired and acquired fame and fortune.
Everyone would stop ‘talking negative about her’ if she stopped behaving in a negative manner. There are quite a few famous people who manage to raise their children quite decently, while still living in the public eye. Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Garner, Kate Beckinsdale and Teri Hatcher come to mind…
January 15th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
hopeless
January 15th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Why is she never with the completely dependent younger child? For pity’s sake?!
January 16th, 2007 at 7:55 am
Yeah. For a 24-year-old, grown woman to wear high heels to a sandpit… Oy…
January 16th, 2007 at 9:12 am
I always wear my heals when I take my son to the park………idiot.