23 Responses to “Katie Holmes takes Isabella shopping in LA, 12/11”

1. Anonymous Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 7:17 pm

   What is up with her belly in the 2nd photo? Still baby weight from SURI?

2. katie Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 7:35 pm

   they look like they’re not comfortable with each other at all.

3. stupidsexyflanders Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 7:42 pm

   wow she has aged about 20 years..poor girl, she looks haggard.

4. anonymous Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 8:02 pm

   Not digging the fishnets at all. And she looks _old_ in these pictures…Free Katie!

5. anonymous Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 8:04 pm

   She has cankles and dead eyes. Yikes!

6. divabrittny Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 8:09 pm

   um.. how old is she? she looks like fifty and dresses like an old lady who does that?

7. Bunny Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 8:48 pm

   I agree! Geez, she’s only 28, she dresses like a 50 year old. She needs a stylist who’s name is NOT Victoria Beckham.

8. busyness Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 10:29 pm

   Why are these children never with their “actual” mother? They are rarely seen with her, and we’ve certainly never seen them with Keith Urban. Weird.

9. Doc Says:
   December 12th, 2006 at 10:33 pm

   She looks nice, tired, but very classically beautiful.

   As for the negative posts: I wonder what we would see if cameras followed YOUR EVERY public move.

   Probably a much more sorry sight than this critisized beauty.

10. Madison Says:
    December 12th, 2006 at 10:53 pm

    I could have the flu and not look like that in pictures. She looks bad. She does look haggard.

11. Anne Says:
    December 12th, 2006 at 11:34 pm

    Can she hire a freaking stylist?, she looks horrible, ungroomed, dosen’t she own a freaking comb?, and what about those fishnet stockings? She has no pride or what? looks like white trash

12. keppa Says:
    December 12th, 2006 at 11:55 pm

    because having a new baby in the house never makes ANYONE look tired…

    nice to you know all would look perfect if you had a new baby

13. Jocelyn Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 12:58 am

    She looks almost dead in the eyes to me… I don’t know what it is…

14. Elke Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 2:43 am

    I think she has aged alot in the last year and a half. Being with somebody that much older, getting engaged, having a baby, and being in constant scrutiny must have made her grow up very fast. She used to look so sweet and young. Now she just looks old before her time. Still very pretty, I admire the clothing they put her in, but she doesn’t have a spark anymore. Too bad.

15. Pam Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 3:55 am

    Who goes shopping dressed up like that? Isabella is dressed normally; why all the formality for katie?? What! Does Scientology prohibit women from wearing jeans? or sneakers? or, god forbid, a t-shirt!!??

16. Jesse D Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 10:03 am

    I think KH knew *exactly* what she was getting into when she got with TC. I don’t think she’s the victim as much as some would like to think. And HOLLYWOOD LADIES – LISTEN UP!! FISHNETS WILL NEVER BELONG ON ANYONE BUT HOOKERS!!! Lose them, quickly.

17. Skye Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 10:38 am

    Nothing wrong with looking a little tired, she’s a mom! I don’t have a problem with her having a bit of a tummy or her hair being messy, she’s still a beautiful woman! However, who the heck dresses like that to go shopping? White skirt and fishnets? She should dress her age…. Katie, you’ll be 40 yrs old soon enough.

18. Paul1550 Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 10:39 am

    Man, she’s looking rough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I give her 18 months before Tom starts making movie after movie and then rids himself of her.

19. Friedman-Klein Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    I like her outfit – I would wear it to work, not to shop. My only problem with her is her posture… STAND UP STRAIGHT!!!

20. Christina Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 6:43 pm

    How come we never see Nicole Kidman with her kids anymore???

21. Blair Says:
    December 13th, 2006 at 8:34 pm

    Christina, I totally agree! It seems like Nicole has moved on from her own children. It doesn’t even seem like she is involved at all anymore. Maybe she is, but surely a picture or two would show up here and there.

22. wonka Says:
    December 14th, 2006 at 8:57 am

    For heaven’s sake. you dont see nicole with the kids because nicole doesnt like the paparazzi taking pictures of them. she wants to shield them. not everyone is a publicity-hungry couch jumper like tom cruise you know. thank goodness their mother is normal.

23. Boobala Says:
    December 14th, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    I hope Katie gets jeans, sweaters and t-shirts for Christmas. Dress comfy for goodness sakes.

Leave a Reply. May take a few minutes to appear.

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website

Security Code: